Evaluation of Research Proposals and Results Subcommittee Members

Mandate


The Committee on the Evaluation of Research Proposals and Results will decide which research projects will be funded on the basis of merit and relevance. The criteria for relevance will be decided by the Research Board subject to the approval of the Board of Representatives. The criteria are together necessary and sufficient. The Committee shall have a chair with expertise in at least one of the three fields of research enunciated above and will be an ex-officio member of the Research Board. There shall be a sufficient number of members of the committee with expertise in the three fields of research enunciated above to evaluate the research projects submitted in a timely way. When variations in the volume of submissions require it, the chair may appoint sufficient consultants to do the work expediently subject, in each case, to the approval of the Chair of the Research Board.


The Committee will evaluate the results of the research projects that have been approved and funded after their completion.


Approved by the Board Aug 2009

NameCommittee PositionFrom dateCountrySociety
Dr. Robert M. Galatzer-LevyChair8/1/2012United StatesAmerican Psychoanalytic Association102790
Wilma BucciMember8/1/2009United States 157284
Dr. Aiban Luciano HagelinMember8/1/2009ArgentinaArgentine Psychoanalytic Association103407
Prof. Dr. phil. Stephan HauMember8/1/2009SwedenSwedish Psychoanalytical Association141470
Johannes LehtonenMember8/1/2009FinlandFinnish Psychoanalytical Society104688
Dr. David Nelson López GarzaMember8/1/2009MexicoMexican Psychoanalytic Association104962
Barbara MilrodMember4/12/2011United StatesAmerican Psychoanalytic Association105508